Another look at sensory attributes of broiler chickens fed with non-fermented and fermented diets

Authors

  • Gerald M. Rivera Visayas State University
  • Leomarich F. Casinillo Visayas State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70954/itmj.v5i1.276

Keywords:

Fermented diet, steamed carcass, sensory attributes, coco vinegar, probiotic

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the sensory attributes and general acceptability of steamed meat of broiler chickens fed with non-fermented (control) and fermented diets. The study used water, water + coco vinegar, and water + RPL8+AKE probiotic as fermenting causal agents. A total of thirty (30) breast carcass (steamed at 100oC for 10-15 minutes) samples per treatment at five grams (5g) per sample were utilized for evaluation. A group of thirty trained taste panelists composed of Food Technology students assessed the sensory attributes using the quality score and Hedonic scale sheets. Descriptive statistics were used in the sensory evaluation, and analysis of variance (ANOVA), and multiple comparison test using Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test was used to compare the treatment means of the sensory attributes of the steamed meat samples in terms of skin color, flesh color, aroma, texture, taste, and general acceptability. The rating scores on skin colors (p-value=0.050), and texture (p-value=0.013) of steamed meat of broiler chickens fed with non-fermented and fermented diets were significantly different at a 5% level. Results revealed that the fermented diets have improved the broilers' skin colors (yellowish cream) and improved the texture quality of meat (moderately firm). Based on ANOVA, there is no significant difference observed in the descriptive scores in relation to flesh color (p-value=0.171), aroma (p-value=0.621), taste (p-value=0.723) and general acceptability (p-value=0.491). However, the steamed carcass of broiler-fed fermented diets (coco vinegar and probiotic) is slightly preferred based on ranks. Hence, fermented diets can modify the meat quality of broilers to meet consumers’ expectations.

Author Biographies

Gerald M. Rivera, Visayas State University

Visca, Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines.

Leomarich F. Casinillo, Visayas State University

Visca, Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines.

References

Al-Owaimer, A. N., Suliman, G. M., Alyemni, A. H., & Abudabos, A. M. (2014). Effect of different probiotics on breast quality characteristics of broilers under Salmonella challenge. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 13(3), 3189.

Bernardeau, M., Vernoux, J. P., & Gueguen, M. (2002). Safety and efficacy of probiotic lactobacilli in promoting growth in post-weaning Swiss mice. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 77(1-2), 19-27.

Bunnell, R. H., & Bauernfeind, J. C. (1962). Chemistry, uses, and properties of carotenoids in foods. Food Technology, 16(7), 36.

Carifio, J., & Perla, R. (2008). Resolving the 50‐year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Medical education, 42(12), 1150-1152.

Castaneda, M. P., Hirschler, E. M., & Sams, A. R. (2005). Skin pigmentation evaluation in broilers fed natural and synthetic pigments. Poultry science, 84(1), 143-147.

Chavez, C., Coufal, C. D., Niemeyer, P. L., Carey, J. B., Lacey, R. E., Miller, R. K., & Beier, R. C. (2004). Impact of dietary supplemental methionine sources on sensory measurement of odor-related compounds in broiler excreta. Poultry science, 83(10), 1655-1662.

Fujiwara, K. I., Miyaguchi, Y., Feng, X. H., Toyoda, A., Nakamura, Y., Yamazaki, M., ... & Abe, H. (2008). Effect of fermented soybean,“Natto” on the production and qualities of chicken meat. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 21(12), 1766-1772.

Hugas, M., & Tsigarida, E. (2008). Pros and cons of carcass decontamination: the role of the European Food Safety Authority. Meat Science, 78(1-2), 43-52.

Ivanovic, S., Baltic, M., Popov-raljic, J. and Pasinov, B. (2012). The Effect of Different Probiotics and Broiler Meat Quality. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 6(5), 937-943.

Joshi, V. K., & Kumar, S. (2015). Meat Analogues: Plant based alternatives to meat products-A review. International Journal of Food and Fermentation Technology, 5(2), 107-119.

Khan, A. Z., Kumbhar, S., Liu, Y., Hamid, M., Pan, C., Nido, S. A., ... & Huang, K. (2018). Dietary supplementation of selenium-enriched probiotics enhances meat quality of broiler chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) raised under high ambient temperature. Biological trace element research, 182(2), 328-338.

Lambio, A. L. (2010). Poultry Production in the Tropics. The University of the Philippines Press, Quezon City.

Lyon, B. G., & Lyon, C. E. (2000). Meat quality: sensory and instrumental evaluations. In Poultry meat processing (pp. 107-130). CRC Press.

Manning, L., Baines, R.N. and Chadd, S.A. (2006). Food safety management in broiler meat production. British Food Journal, 108(8), 605-621. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700610681987

Mir, N. A., Rafiq, A., Kumar, F., Singh, V., & Shukla, V. (2017). Determinants of broiler chicken meat quality and factors affecting them: a review. Journal of food science and technology, 54(10), 2997-3009.

Nauta, M. J., Fischer, A. R., Van Asselt, E. D., De Jong, A. E., Frewer, L. J., & De Jonge, R. (2008). Food safety in the domestic environment: the effect of consumer risk information on human disease risks. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 28(1), 179-192.

Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in health sciences education, 15(5), 625-632.

Ollinger, M., & Moore, D. L. (2008). The economic forces driving food safety quality in meat and poultry. Review of Agricultural Economics, 30(2), 289-310.

Onibi, G. E., Adebisi, O. E., & Fajemisin, A. N. (2009). Response of broiler chickens in terms of performance and meat quality to garlic (Allium sativum) supplementation. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4(5), 511-517.

Othaman, M. A., Sharifudin, S. A., Mansor, A. Z. L. I. N. A., Kahar, A. A., & Long, K. A. M. A. R. I. A. H. (2014). Coconut water vinegar: new alternative with improved processing technique. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 9(3), 293-302.

Pellattiero, E., Tasoniero, G., Cullere, M., Gleeson, E., Baldan, G., Contiero, B., & Dalle Zotte, A. (2020). Are meat quality traits and sensory attributes in favor of slow-growing chickens?. Animals, 10(6), 960.

Pelicano, E. R. L., De Souza, P. A., De Souza, H. B. A., Oba, A., Norkus, E. A., Kodawara, L. M., & De Lima, T. M. A. (2003). Effect of different probiotics on broiler carcass and meat quality. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 5, 207-214.

Peryam, D. R., & Pilgrim, F. J. (1957). Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences. Food Technology, 11, 9–14.

Rivera, G. M., & Casinillo, L. F. (2021). Which is better, non-fermented or fermented diets? the case of production of broilers. Aceh Journal of Animal Science, 6(3), 79 - 85. https://doi.org/10.13170/ajas.6.3.20647

Shaviklo, A. R., Alizadeh-Ghamsari, A. H., & Hosseini, S. A. (2021). Sensory attributes and meat quality of broiler chickens fed with mealworm (Tenebrio molitor). Journal of food science and technology, 58(12), 4587-4597. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13197-020-04946-w

Thames, H. T., & Theradiyil Sukumaran, A. (2020). A review of Salmonella and Campylobacter in broiler meat: Emerging challenges and food safety measures. Foods, 9(6), 776.

Wahyono, N. D., & Utami, M. M. D. (2018). A review of the poultry meat production industry for food safety in Indonesia. In Journal of Physics: conference series (Vol. 953, No. 1, p. 012125). IOP Publishing.

Wang, Y., Sun, J., Zhong, H., Li, N., Xu, H., Zhu, Q., & Liu, Y. (2017). Effect of probiotics on the meat flavour and gut microbiota of chicken. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1-13.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-01

How to Cite

Rivera, G. M. ., & Casinillo, L. F. . (2022). Another look at sensory attributes of broiler chickens fed with non-fermented and fermented diets. Innovative Technology and Management Journal, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.70954/itmj.v5i1.276